When Your Allies Prefer to Buy Russian Arms - America's Growing Headache
Published on August 7, 2018 by Asha Castleberry
Russia continues to export arms, including its S-400 missile system, to long standing U.S. and NATO allies causing legal and political headaches.
In the past two years Qatar, Iraq, Egypt and even the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, all regional allies of the United States, have expressed interest in purchasing Russian anti-aircraft solutions such as the S-400 Missile Defense System, a modern long range surface-to-air system. Even more troubling is the fact that Turkey, a long-standing NATO member of great importance, is also considering the S-400 as a viable option.
The U.S. Congress is now arguing that these allies are subject to sanctions under a federal law known as the U.S. Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA). This has caused a diplomatic rift, as allies are now having to deal with the U.S. casting these arms deals as part of an ongoing political showdown between the U.S. and Russia.
The purpose of CAATSA —a bipartisan legislation passed with a strong consensus in August 2017 —is to impose sanctions on Russia, North Korea, and Iran. More specifically, CAATSA targets Russian defense and energy entities that were engaged in cyber activities against the United States during the 2016 presidential elections. Section 231 prohibits any entity or individual that “engages in a significant transaction with a person that is part of, or operates for or on behalf of, the defense or intelligence sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation.”
With secondary sanctions against Russian defense and energy entities, the U.S. Government appears hopeful that its allies will be compelled to invest more in U.S. Foreign Military Sales (FMS) or seek CAATSA waivers. Turkey, India, and Qatar appear particularly eager to purchase the S-400 system from Russia. There is a growing global consensus that the Russian S-400 is the best air-missile defense system, with various analysts and media outlets claiming it is the most powerful long-range air missile defense system in the world.
Essentially, the S-400 is a technologically more advanced variation of the Soviet S-300P anti-aircraft system. It began as a late 1980s upgrade program, only to emerge in the mid 90s as the S-300PMU-3. It was not until it entered its final phases in the mid-2000s that it was decided the advances made were so significant, it qualified for a designator: the S-400. The S-400 features significantly improved and advanced radar systems, enhanced speed, and high-resolution imagery over its direct predecessors the S-300PM2 and S-300PMU2. All in all, the S-400 missile defense system is extremely effective, with sharp accuracy that can quickly destroy incoming high-value targets like drones, ballistic missiles, and aircraft.
n the case of Turkey, Ankara signed an agreement with Moscow to purchase the new S-400 Missile Defense System in December 2017, creating a political debacle. As a NATO ally, Turkey was actively participating in U.S. Foreign Military Sales (FMS) programs like the F-35 Joint Strike Fighterprocurement, yet it had agreed to purchase Russia’s S-400 system worth roughly $2.5 billion.
In response, the U.S Senate Committee on Armed Services considered temporarily removing Turkey from being part of the F-35 program under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) so as to send a strong message that the United States will not integrate their most advanced stealth jet fighter with a Russian capability. An S-400 integration with an F-35, the committee argued, could put the United States and NATO at operational risk by potentially disclosing intelligence and complicating interoperability.
Additionally, the NATO Secretary-General stated that it would be very difficult to integrate the S-400 missile defense system with NATO’s air defense architecture. All NATO members have pledged to integrate military equipment to ensure that all systems work together. It is vital that all NATO equipment must maintain mutual standards. These standards are developed based on long term joint planning, exercises and training. An S-400 integration would disrupt joint information sharing, command and control, and protection of missile interceptors and radars.
In response to these concerns, India has requested a CAATSA waiver through the Trump Administration. Reliant on Moscow as one of its top defense suppliers (more than sixty percent of its defense articles are Russian imports), India is interested in the S-400, yet has been feeling pressure from the U.S., which officially considers India a regional, democratic ally. New Delhi remains instrumental in some of America’s top national security priorities, including its regional approach in Afghanistan and India’s strategic importance in the U.S. Indo-Pacific defense strategy.
Meanwhile, Qatar and Russia have discussed a deal in purchasing the S-400 along with small arms and grenades. This is understandably alarming for Washington defense insiders, as the U.S. has been strengthening its defense ties with Doha for over twenty years. Qatar has been a vital partner in Operation Inherent Resolve by hosting one of the largest U.S. military bases in the Middle East and is complementary in joint air operations in Syria and Iraq. Qatar is also involved in many U.S. arms deals, including U.S. helicopters, C17 engines and equipment, and McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagles.
Growing interest in the S-400 has also provoked greater scrutiny about Russian competition against the highly competitive U.S. defense security cooperation. Since the authorization of the Arms Export Control Act of 1963, the U.S. has relied on FMS procurement as a national security priority in maintaining its alliance system. Consequently, the U.S. has spent decades and billions of dollars transferring defense articles and services to its allies. This practice must continue because Russia understands the power of FMS cases and is willing to counter it by developing and selling competitive capabilities to U.S. allies. So far, Russia has successfully expanded its efforts in the Middle East by aggressively pursuing and securing arms deals with the Gulf states of Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia.
In order to stay competitive against Russia’s aggressive foreign military sales program, the U.S. should consider a multilateral approach.
First, the U.S. should continue to actively enforce CAATSA. Second, Washington should remain actively engaged with allies by negotiating competitive options to deter interest in acquiring Russian compatibilities. In the case of Turkey, Washington made the right decision to reinvigorate negotiations with Ankara in purchasing the U.S. Patriot Missile System over the Russian S-400. Such a retaliatory move was justifiable, as Moscow continues to try to shake up U.S. defense ties with strategic allies. For instance, Moscow initiated talks with Iraq over the S-400 knowing that Washington is conducting current military operations with Baghdad.
Third, Congress should still consider CAATSA waivers on a case-by-case basis, approving waivers only when benefits outweigh the costs. In other words, it is vital that Congress thoroughly calculates how much the sanctions will adversely affect U.S. strategic partnerships.
Lastly, the U.S. must convince its strategic allies that it remains a reliable partner with a coherent foreign policy approach. Mixed messages will fail to deter key allies from purchasing Russian-made capabilities, as will counterproductive foreign policy decisions such as failing to promote the spread of democracy, overtly fighting with Qatar over Saudi Arabia, and demonstrating a lack of strategy in Syria beyond the anti-ISIS campaign. Counterproductive decisions will weaken relationships and inflame distrust, provoking allies into considering purchasing Russian arms.
Worthy of note, just this May China received its first delivery of the Russian S-400 missile system.
Asha Castleberry, Lima Charlie News
[John Sjoholm contributed to this article][Edited by Anthony A. LoPresti]
Asha Castleberry is an adjunct faculty professor at Fordham University. She teaches U.S. Foreign Policy, International Politics, and United Nations Peace Operations. She is a U.S. Army Veteran and she served for Combined Joint Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve in Iraq and Kuwait.
Lima Charlie provides global news, featuring insight & analysis by military veterans and service members Worldwide.